{"id":486,"date":"2009-02-04T20:13:42","date_gmt":"2009-02-05T01:13:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/?p=486"},"modified":"2009-02-04T20:13:42","modified_gmt":"2009-02-05T01:13:42","slug":"a-mean-and-nasty-budget","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/a-mean-and-nasty-budget\/","title":{"rendered":"A mean and nasty budget"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"subhead\">Supporting it puts the Liberals in bed with the Blue Meanies<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/5\/images\/Blue_Meanies_hand_454x274_shadow.jpg\" class=\"small-left\" alt=\"The Leader of the Bue Meanies\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"crosshead\">The Hand of the Blue Meanies lies behind the &lsquo;stimulus&rsquo; budget<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"smallcaps\">Ottawa &mdash; <\/span>Despite his protestation that he was putting the Harper government &lsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thestar.com\/news\/canada\/article\/578956\" target=\"_blank\">on probation<\/a>,&rsquo; this week Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff ordered his minions &mdash; I&rsquo;m sorry, I meant his MPs &mdash; to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/canada\/story\/2009\/02\/03\/budget-vote.html\" target=\"_blank\">vote in favour<\/a> of finance minister Jim Flaherty&rsquo;s questionable &lsquo;stimulus&rsquo; budget.<\/p>\n<p>Ignatieff graciously allowed his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/canada\/newfoundland-labrador\/story\/2009\/02\/02\/okeefe-mps.html\" target=\"_blank\">six Newfoundland Liberal MPs<\/a> to vote against the budget, which will force a reduction in that province&rsquo;s federal transfer payments by between one billion and $1.6 billion over the next three years, a cut <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20090128.weIgnatieff29\/BNStory\/politics\" target=\"_blank\">vehemently opposed<\/a> by premier Danny Williams.<\/p>\n<p>Ignatieff&rsquo;s support for the budget was to all appearances based on short-term political expediency. Canada&rsquo;s corporate media hailed his move as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20090128.weIgnatieff29\/BNStory\/politics\" target=\"_blank\">politically mature<\/a>. Really, it gives him time to rebuild his tottering party.<\/p>\n<p>This vote puts the Liberals firmly in bed with Canada&rsquo;s very own <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beatles.com\/yellow\/splash.php\" target=\"_blank\">Blue Meanies<\/a>, and raises questions as to whether there is any real difference between Ignatieff&rsquo;s Liberals and Harper&rsquo;s newly-centralist Conservatives.<\/p>\n<p class=\"crosshead\">Flawed economic strategy<\/p>\n<p>Flaherty&rsquo;s budget is a very flawed document. Based on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20090203.westimate03\/BNStory\/crashandrecovery\/home\" target=\"_blank\">questionable predictions<\/a> of a recovery within two years, even its $40 billion spending largesse that will create a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/money\/story\/2009\/01\/22\/deficitoutlook.html\" target=\"_blank\">deficit of over $64 billion<\/a> over the next two years, may not provide the stimulus the Canadian economy will need.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The proviso that<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20090115.wPOLpremiers0115\/BNStory\/politics\/home\" target=\"_blank\"> infrastructure project funding<\/a> must be P3s and that their financing must be shared equally with provinces and cities will throw an additional burdenon cash-strapped Canadian governments even as transfer payments are being cut back.\n<\/li>\n<li>Using tax reductions as a strategy to mitigate the economic slump has been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/RTGAM.20090127.wbudget_economy0127\/BNStory\/budget2009\/home\" target=\"_blank\">questioned by even mainstream economists<\/a>.\n<\/li>\n<li>The one billion dollars of tax reductions bestowed on middle and upper income earners may not even be invested in Canada. It will have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.policyalternatives.ca\/~ASSETS\/DOCUMENT\/National_Office_Pubs\/2009\/Budget_Analysis.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">no effect on the working poor<\/a> and will make it more difficult for future generations to manage their national debt.\n<\/li>\n<li>Failure to improve the <a href=\"http:\/\/cupe.ca\/budget\/2009-budget-employment-insurance\" target=\"_blank\"> the EI system<\/a> means that many of the growing number of unemployed won&rsquo;t get needed assistance.\n<\/li>\n<li>$3 billion dollars of non-refundable tax credits up to $1,375 per family if more than $10,000 is spent on home renovation will do nothing for those who cannot afford it or do not own a home.<\/li>\n<li>The budget also gives short shrift to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psac.com\/news\/2009\/releases\/06-0109-e.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">women<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/naturecanadablog.blogspot.com\/2009\/01\/budget-that-misses-mark.html\" target=\"_blank\">environment<\/a>, and even to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rabble.ca\/news\/business-scholarships-open-letter-parliamentarians\" target=\"_blank\">academic freedom<\/a>. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"crosshead\">Shared belief in a financial &eacute;lite<\/p>\n<p>Behind the rhetoric of opposition, the Liberal party&rsquo;s complicity with Stephen Harper&rsquo;s Conservatives points to the fact that that both share a common belief in the superiority of Canada&#8217;s financial &eacute;lite and its right to allocate to itself an ever-growing slice of Canada&rsquo;s economic pie.<\/p>\n<p>The main difference between their parties is that they represent two geographically-distinct and competing power bases: Calgary and the New West versus Toronto and Canada&rsquo;s dominant Eastern establishment.<\/p>\n<p>Harper&rsquo;s new Conservatives have in addition a pathological  streak of neo-conservative religiosity that offends traditional Tories. And Liberals have always managed to cloak their superiority with a mantle of concern &mdash; not that that ever mattered where large sums of money were involved.<\/p>\n<p>So don&rsquo;t be impressed by the protestations of Count Ignatieff, or the apparent conversion of a neo-conservative government to the merits of Keynsian economics. It&rsquo;s all an act to confuse the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hoi_polloi\" target=\"_blank\"><em>hoi polloi<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The iron Hand of the Blue Meanies hides behind this &lsquo;stimulus&rsquo; budget, and that&rsquo;s just fine with Michael Ignatieff&rsquo;s Liberal party and caucus.<\/p>\n<p>Only a progressive, coalition government will tame the excesses of Canada&rsquo;s two &eacute;litist political parties. Nothing less will do.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/5\/images\/Blue_Meanie_Leader_104x122_shadow.jpg\" class=\"small-left\" alt=\"The Leader of the Blue Meanies\" \/><span class=\"smallcaps\"><strong>Their vote this week to support Harper&rsquo;s<\/strong><\/span> &lsquo;stimulus&rsquo; budget puts Michael Ignatieff&rsquo;s Liberals firmly in bed with Canada&rsquo;s very own <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beatles.com\/yellow\/splash.php\" target=\"_blank\">Blue Meanies<\/a>, and raises questions as to whether there is any real difference between Ignatieff&rsquo;s Liberals and Harper&rsquo;s newly-centralist Conservatives. It&rsquo;s just a question of competing &eacute;lites who both believe in their superiority.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[11,15,71,16,18,19,33,34,46],"class_list":["post-486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-canada","tag-blue-meanies","tag-budget","tag-canada","tag-canadian-politics","tag-coalition","tag-conservative-party","tag-liberal-party","tag-michael-ignatieff","tag-stephen-harper"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=486"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/486\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.stuzog.com\/majoritycoalition\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}